Re: [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:36 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench (x86_64 specific) to measure
> uprobes/uretprobes on top of nop5 instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           | 12 ++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_uprobes.sh |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

[...]

>  static void usetup(bool use_retprobe, bool use_multi, void *target_addr)
>  {
>         size_t uprobe_offset;
> @@ -448,6 +462,28 @@ static void uretprobe_multi_ret_setup(void)
>         usetup(true, true /* use_multi */, &uprobe_target_ret);
>  }
>
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +static void uprobe_nop5_setup(void)
> +{
> +       usetup(false, false /* !use_multi */, &uprobe_target_nop5);
> +}
> +
> +static void uretprobe_nop5_setup(void)
> +{
> +       usetup(false, false /* !use_multi */, &uprobe_target_nop5);
> +}

true /* use_retprobe */

that's the problem with bench setup, right?

> +
> +static void uprobe_multi_nop5_setup(void)
> +{
> +       usetup(false, true /* use_multi */, &uprobe_target_nop5);
> +}
> +
> +static void uretprobe_multi_nop5_setup(void)
> +{
> +       usetup(false, true /* use_multi */, &uprobe_target_nop5);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  const struct bench bench_trig_syscall_count = {
>         .name = "trig-syscall-count",
>         .validate = trigger_validate,

[...]





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux