Re: [PATCH net-next v4 07/11] net-timestamp: support hwtstamp print for bpf extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:26 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12/7/24 9:37 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Passing the hwtstamp to bpf prog which can print.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   include/net/sock.h |  6 ++++--
> >   net/core/skbuff.c  | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >   net/core/sock.c    |  4 +++-
> >   3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index f88a00108a2f..9bc883573208 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -2921,9 +2921,11 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> >
> >   void sock_enable_timestamps(struct sock *sk);
> >   #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
> > -void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op);
> > +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> > +                            u32 nargs, u32 *args);
> >   #else
> > -static inline void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> > +static inline void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> > +                                          u32 nargs, u32 *args)
> >   {
> >   }
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 48b0c71e9522..182a44815630 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -5539,8 +5539,12 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
> >
> > -static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype)
> > +static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > +                             struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> > +                             int tstype)
> >   {
> > +     struct timespec64 tstamp;
> > +     u32 args[2] = {0, 0};
> >       int op;
> >
> >       if (!sk)
> > @@ -5552,6 +5556,11 @@ static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype
> >               break;
> >       case SCM_TSTAMP_SND:
> >               op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB;
>
> > +             if (hwtstamps) {
> > +                     tstamp = ktime_to_timespec64(hwtstamps->hwtstamp);
>
> Avoid this conversion which is likely not useful to the bpf prog. Directly pass
> hwtstamps->hwtstamp (in ns?) to the bpf prog. Put lower 32bits in args[0] and
> higher 32bits in args[1].

It makes sense.

>
> Also, how about adding a BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_"HW"_OPT_CB for the "hwtstamps != NULL"
> case instead of reusing the BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_"SW"_OPT_CB?

Good suggestion. Will do that.

>
> A more subtle thing for the hwtstamps case is, afaik the bpf prog will not be
> called. All drivers are still only testing SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP instead of testing
> (SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF).

Ah, I didn't realize that!!

>
> There are a lot of drivers to change though. A quick thought is to rename the
> existing SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (e.g. __SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP = 1 << 0) and define
> SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP like:
>
> #define SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (__SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF)

I will take it, thanks!

>
> Then change some of the existing skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags "setting" site to use
> __SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP instead. e.g. in __sock_tx_timestamp(). Not very pretty but
> may be still better than changing many drivers. May be there is a better way...

I agree with your approach. Changing so many drivers would be a head-ache thing.

>
> While talking about where to test the SKBTX_BPF bit, I wonder if the new
> skb_tstamp_is_set() is needed. For the non SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP case, the number of
> tx_flags testing sites should be limited, so should be easy to add the SKBTX_BPF
> bit test. e.g. at the __dev_queue_xmit, test "if
> (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & (SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF)))". Patch
> 6 has also tested the bpf specific bit at tcp_ack_tstamp() before calling the
> __skb_tstamp_tx().
>
> At the beginning of __skb_tstamp_tx(), do something like this:
>
> void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
>                      const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
>                      struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
>                      struct sock *sk, int tstype)
> {
>         if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
>             unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_BPF))
>                 __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);
>
>         if (unlikely(!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & ~SKBTX_BPF)))
>                 return;
>
> Then the new skb_tstamp_tx_output() shuffle is probably not be needed also.
>
> > +                     args[0] = tstamp.tv_sec;
> > +                     args[1] = tstamp.tv_nsec;
> > +             }
> >               break;
> >       case SCM_TSTAMP_ACK:
> >               op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB;
> > @@ -5560,7 +5569,7 @@ static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype
> >               return;
> >       }
> >
> > -     bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(sk, skb, op);
> > +     bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(sk, skb, op, 2, args);
> >   }
> >
> >   static void skb_tstamp_tx_output(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> > @@ -5651,7 +5660,7 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> >       if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, false)))
> >               skb_tstamp_tx_output(orig_skb, ack_skb, hwtstamps, sk, tstype);
> >       if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, true)))
> > -             __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, tstype);
> > +             __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__skb_tstamp_tx);
> >
> > @@ -5662,7 +5671,7 @@ void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> >
> >       skb_tstamp_tx_output(orig_skb, NULL, hwtstamps, orig_skb->sk, tstype);
> >       if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, true)))
> > -             __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(orig_skb->sk, orig_skb, tstype);
> > +             __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(orig_skb->sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_tstamp_tx);
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index 79cb5c74c76c..504939bafe0c 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -942,7 +942,8 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> >   }
> >
> >   #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
> > -void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> > +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> > +                            u32 nargs, u32 *args)
>
> Directly pass hwtstamps->hwtstamp instead of args and nargs. Save a memcpy below.
>
> >   {
> >       struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
> >
> > @@ -952,6 +953,7 @@ void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> >       sock_ops.op = op;
> >       sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
> >       sock_ops.sk = sk;
> > +     memcpy(sock_ops.args, args, nargs * sizeof(*args));
> >       __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops(sk, &sock_ops, CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
> >   }
> >   #endif
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux