On Thu, 2024-12-12 at 20:29 +0000, Alan Maguire wrote:
[...]
> Looks good to me. I _think_ we're safe enough in assuming the tag
> ordering "bpf_kfunc bpf_fastcall" in the btf_functions.sh test, right?
For "bpf_kfunc bpf_fastcall" yes, we should be safe.
On the other hand, I don't think the below could be simplified with
this knowledge:
+ awk '{ gsub("^(bpf_kfunc |bpf_fastcall )+",""); print $0}'|sort|uniq
Because there are situations when only "bpf_kfunc" is present
and when both "bpf_kfunc", "bpf_fastcall" are present.
[...]
