On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:18:10AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 09:31:11AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote: > > This series follows up on the discussion in [1] for fixing the static > > linkage issue in bpftool. > > > > Patch 01 introduces a new feature for libelf-zstd. If this feature > > is detected, it means the zstd lib is required by libelf. > > > > Patch 02 is a minor improvement for linking the zstd lib in the perf. > > > > Patch 03 fixes the static build failure by linking the zstd lib when > > the feature-libelf-zstd is detected. > > So, this was originally reported as a perf build failure when trying a > static build, so something not so common, no urgency, I guess, but it > involves a tools/perf/bpftool/Makefile change, I think I can process > this as I'll then test it in the many build containers for old distros I > have, ok? As Quentin said in another reply, there is a delta change between the Linux perf tree and bpf-next tree. So this series has a conflict on bpf-next tree but it can be applied cleanly on perf tree. Before I respin to update the commit logs based on comments, I need BPF maintainers agreement with Arnaldo on proceeding on which source tree to proceed with. Thanks, Leo
