Jiayuan Chen wrote: > 'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the > action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS, > the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to > tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature. > > It works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also modified > 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb' > to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'. > > However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are > active(strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of > tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock) > tcp_read_sock() now still update 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated > updates. > > In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated > in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(). > > The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent > correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land. > > Modifying tcp_read_sock() or strparser implementation directly is > unreasonable, as it is widely used in other modules. > > Here, we introduce a method tcp_bpf_read_sock() to replace > 'sk->sk_socket->ops->read_sock' (like 'tls_build_proto()' does in > tls_main.c). Such replacement action was also used in updating > tcp_bpf_prots in tcp_bpf.c, so it's not weird. > (Note that checkpatch.pl may complain missing 'const' qualifier when we > define the bpf-specified 'proto_ops', but we have to do because we need > update it). > > Also we remove strparser check in tcp_eat_skb() since we implement custom > function tcp_bpf_read_sock() without copied_seq updating. > > Since strparser currently supports only TCP, it's sufficient for 'ops' to > inherit inet_stream_ops. > > In strparser's implementation, regardless of partial or full reads, > it completely clones the entire skb, allowing us to unconditionally > free skb in tcp_bpf_read_sock(). > > Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq") > Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@xxxxxxx> [...] > +/* The tcp_bpf_read_sock() is an alternative implementation > + * of tcp_read_sock(), except that it does not update copied_seq. > + */ > +static int tcp_bpf_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc, > + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor) > +{ > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + int copied = 0; > + > + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) > + return -ENOTCONN; > + > + while ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) { > + u8 tcp_flags; > + int used; > + > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk)); > + tcp_flags = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags; > + used = recv_actor(desc, skb, 0, skb->len); Here the skb is still on the receive_queue how does this work with tcp_try_coalesce()? So I believe you need to unlink before you call the actor which creates a bit of trouble if recv_actor doesn't want the entire skb. I think easier is to do similar logic to read_sock and track offset and len? Did I miss something. > + /* strparser clone and consume all input skb > + * even in waiting head or body status > + */ > + tcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb); > + if (used <= 0) { > + if (!copied) > + copied = used; > + break; > + } > + copied += used; > + if (!desc->count) > + break; > + if (tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN) > + break; > + } > + return copied; > +} > + > enum { > TCP_BPF_IPV4, > TCP_BPF_IPV6, > @@ -595,6 +636,10 @@ enum {