Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/5] bpf: Add bpf_fget_task() kfunc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/12/10 14:28, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:03:52PM +0000, Juntong Deng wrote:
This patch adds bpf_fget_task() kfunc.

bpf_fget_task() is used to get a pointer to the struct file
corresponding to the task file descriptor. Note that this function
acquires a reference to struct file.

Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
index 3fe9f59ef867..19a9d45c47f9 100644
--- a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
+++ b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
@@ -152,6 +152,26 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_get_file_xattr(struct file *file, const char *name__str,
  	return bpf_get_dentry_xattr(dentry, name__str, value_p);
  }
+/**
+ * bpf_fget_task() - Get a pointer to the struct file corresponding to
+ * the task file descriptor
+ *
+ * Note that this function acquires a reference to struct file.
+ *
+ * @task: the specified struct task_struct
+ * @fd: the file descriptor
+ *
+ * @returns the corresponding struct file pointer if found,
+ * otherwise returns NULL
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc struct file *bpf_fget_task(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int fd)
+{
+	struct file *file;
+
+	file = fget_task(task, fd);
+	return file;

Why the local variable?

Thanks for your reply.

Uh, I forgot why I wrote it like that.

Yes, I agree that it is redundant.

I will remove it in the next version.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux