Re: [Patch bpf v2 0/4] bpf: a bug fix and test cases for bpf_skb_change_tail()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Cong,
> 
> On 11/29/24 2:22 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patchset fixes a bug in bpf_skb_change_tail() helper and adds test
> > cases for it, as requested by Daniel and John.
> > 
> > ---
> > v2: added a test case for TC where offsets are positive
> >      fixed a typo in 1/4 patch description
> >      reduced buffer size in the sockmap test case
> 
> I ran the selftest several times but it's repeatedly failing whereas
> without the series bpf tree CI seems fine. The CI fails on tc tests,
> so potentially patch 4 is causing this.

Ah, thanks for catching it. 

Previously, the CI job failed due to flaky tests, which are tests that
inconsistently pass or fail. However, this time the failure indicates
a genuine issue.

> 
> Switching over to tcx APIs from libbpf might automatically address
> this given the failures seem to be in 'revision unexpected' which is
> likely due to legacy libbpf tc APIs detaching but not deleting the
> underlying qdisc.

Sure, thanks for the hint. I will update this patchset.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux