Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the bpf-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 11:16 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
>   c721d8f8b196 ("selftests/bpf: ensure proper root namespace cleanup when test fail")
>
> Fixes tag
>
>   Fixes: 284ed00a59dd ("selftests/bpf: migrate flow_dissector namespace exclusivity test")
>
> has these problem(s):
>
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>
> Maybe you meant
>
> Fixes: 6fb5be12d1bb ("selftests/bpf: migrate flow_dissector namespace exclusivity test")

I believe the fixes tag was correct when it was first applied
during merge window (without being in for-next),
but then bpf-next/master was rebased after rc1 was released
and fixes tag became wrong.
Now the commit c721d8f8b196 is so far down that we cannot fix it and
force push it. We don't rebase after rc1 either.
Sadly it would have to stay this way.
We probably need to run our pw-check [0] script during the rebase
to make sure such mistakes don't happen.

[0]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/pw.git/tree/pw-check





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux