On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 12:14 AM CET, John Fastabend wrote:
> Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> sk_msg and ULP frameworks override protocol callbacks pointer in
>> sk->sk_prot, while TCP accesses it locklessly when cloning the listening
>> socket.
>>
>> Once we enable use of listening sockets with sockmap (and hence sk_msg),
>> there can be shared access to sk->sk_prot if socket is getting cloned while
>> being inserted/deleted to/from the sockmap from another CPU. Mark the
>> shared access with READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE annotations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In sockmap side I fixed this by wrapping the access in a lock_sock[0]. So
> Do you think this is still needed with that in mind? The bpf_clone call
> is using sk_prot_creater and also setting the newsk's proto field. Even
> if the listening parent sock was being deleted in parallel would that be
> a problem? We don't touch sk_prot_creator from the tear down path. I've
> only scanned the 3..11 patches so maybe the answer is below. If that is
> the case probably an improved commit message would be helpful.
I think it is needed. Not because of tcp_bpf_clone or that we access
listener's sk_prot_creator from there, if I'm grasping your question.
Either way I'm glad this came up. Let's go though my reasoning and
verify it. tcp stack accesses the listener sk_prot while cloning it:
tcp_v4_rcv
sk = __inet_lookup_skb(...)
tcp_check_req(sk)
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock
tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock
tcp_create_openreq_child
inet_csk_clone_lock
sk_clone_lock
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)
It grabs a reference to the listener, but doesn't grab the sk_lock.
On another CPU we can be inserting/removing the listener socket from the
sockmap and writing to its sk_prot. We have the update and the remove
path:
sock_map_ops->map_update_elem
sock_map_update_elem
sock_map_update_common
sock_map_link_no_progs
tcp_bpf_init
tcp_bpf_update_sk_prot
sk_psock_update_proto
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, ops)
sock_map_ops->map_delete_elem
sock_map_delete_elem
__sock_map_delete
sock_map_unref
sk_psock_put
sk_psock_drop
sk_psock_restore_proto
tcp_update_ulp
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, proto)
Following the guidelines from KTSAN project [0], sk_prot looks like a
candidate for annotating it. At least on these 3 call paths.
If that sounds correct, I can add it to the patch description.
Thanks,
-jkbs
[0] https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/READ_ONCE-and-WRITE_ONCE
