On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 19:37, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 10:11 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think we need to revert the raw_tp masking hack and > > > go with denylist the way Jiri proposed: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrIj9jkXqpKXRuS7@krava/ > > ... > > > Jiri, do you have the diff around for that attempt? Could you post a > > revert of the patches and then the diff you shared? > > the link above. The link only has information about one tracepoint, but further down the thread Jiri found more examples and the case of IS_ERR. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zr3q8ihbe8cUdpfp@krava It would probably be good to add all of them? Or did I misunderstand and you just add PTR_MAYBE_NULL for the scheduler tracepoint in the report?
