From: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@xxxxxxx>
Currently, KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ITER handling missed checking the reg->type and
ensuring it is PTR_TO_STACK. Instead of enforcing this in the caller of
process_iter_arg, move the check into it instead so that all callers
will gain the check by default. This is similar to process_dynptr_func.
An existing selftest in verifier_bits_iter.c fails due to this change,
but it's because it was passing a NULL pointer into iter_next helper and
getting an error further down the checks, but probably meant to pass an
uninitialized iterator on the stack (as is done in the subsequent test
below it). We will gain coverage for non-PTR_TO_STACK arguments in later
patches hence just change the declaration to zero-ed stack object.
Fixes: 06accc8779c1 ("bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@xxxxxxx>
[ Kartikeya: move check into process_iter_arg, rewrite commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1c4ebb326785..358a3566bb60 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8189,6 +8189,11 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_id
const struct btf_type *t;
int spi, err, i, nr_slots, btf_id;
+ if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to an iterator on stack\n", regno - 1);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* For iter_{new,next,destroy} functions, btf_check_iter_kfuncs()
* ensures struct convention, so we wouldn't need to do any BTF
* validation here. But given iter state can be passed as a parameter
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
index 7c881bca9af5..a7a6ae6c162f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ __description("uninitialized iter in ->next()")
__failure __msg("expected an initialized iter_bits as arg #1")
int BPF_PROG(next_uninit, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp)
{
- struct bpf_iter_bits *it = NULL;
+ struct bpf_iter_bits it = {};
- bpf_iter_bits_next(it);
+ bpf_iter_bits_next(&it);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.5
