On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:36 AM Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:22AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> [..]
> > Moving bpf_base_func_proto() all the way to the top was incorrect,
> > but here we can move it just above this bpf_token_capable() check
> > and remove extra indent like:
> >
> > func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto();
> > if (func_proto)
> > return func_proto;
> > if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > return NULL;
> > switch (func_id) {
> > case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
> >
> > that will align it with the style of bpf_base_func_proto().
> >
> > pw-bot: cr
>
> Ack, let me change that.
>
> Below is preview of v4 for this bit.
lgtm
