Re: [PATCH] tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:07:24 -0800
Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>, Eddy Z <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241128025551.2868-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:56 PM liujing <liujing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The output format of unsigned int should be %u, and the output
> format of int should be %d, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

same issue. full name pls.

pw-bot: cr

References:
- [PATCH] tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier
  - From: liujing

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Optimize resource leakage problems
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: Consolidate locks and reference state in verifier state
Previous by thread: [PATCH] tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux