On 11/25/24 2:52 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
# ./test_progs -t smc
#27/1 bpf_smc/load:OK
#27 bpf_smc:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
The above command is based on several kernel modules. After these dependent
kernel modules are loaded, then can run the above command successfully.
This is indeed a problem, a better way may be to create a separate testing
directory for SMC, and we are trying to do this.
Got it. In the latest patch series, if a test program in sample/bpf can verify
this bpf feature, it is better than a selftest program in the directory tools/
testing/selftests/bpf.
I delved into this selftest tool. It seems that this selftest tool only makes
the basic checks. A test program in sample/bpf can do more.
sample(s)/bpf? No new test should be added to samples/bpf which is obsolete. The
bpf CI only runs tests under selftests/bpf.
There is selftests/bpf/config to tell the bpf CI about what kconfig needs to
turn on.
