Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 16:30, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
> [...]
>> >
>> > After these changes, does the noinline (commit 47b123ed9e99 ("xdp:
>> > split code for map vs non-map redirect")) still make sense?
>>
>> Hmm, good question. The two code paths are certainly close to one
>> another; and I guess they could be consolidated further.
>>
>> The best case would be if we had a way to lookup the ifindex directly in
>> the helper. Do you know if there's a way to get the current net
>> namespace from the helper? Can we use current->nsproxy->net_ns in that
>> context?
>>
>
> Nope, interrupt context. :-( Another (ugly) way is adding a netns
> member to the bpf_redirect_info, that is populated by the driver
> (driver changes everywhere -- ick). So no.
Yup, that's what I thought. OK, too bad; I'll see what other
consolidation I can do with the current code, then.
> (And *if* one would go the route of changing all drivers, I think the
> percpu bpf_redirect_info should be replaced a by a context that is
> passed from the driver to the XDP program execution and
> xdp_do_redirect/flush. But that's a much bigger patch. :-))
Yeah, let's leave that until the next time we figure out we have to
change all the drivers, then ;)
-Toke
