Re: [PATCH] bpftool: Fix the wrong format specifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpftool: Fix the wrong format specifier
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:32:22 -0800
Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>, Eddy Z <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241121121712.5633-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 4:17 AM liujing <liujing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The type of lines is unsigned int, so the correct format specifier should be
> %u instead of %d.
>
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Please use your full name.

Same issue with another patch.

pw-bot: cr

References:
- [PATCH] bpftool: Fix the wrong format specifier
  - From: liujing

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: always clear DMA mapping information when unmapping the pool
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] bpftool: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing in prog_dump()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] bpftool: Fix the wrong format specifier
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: Improve debug message when the base BTF cannot be found
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux