Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] tracing: Use guard() rather than scoped_guard()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 09:25:14AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Using scoped_guard() in the implementation of trace_##name() adds an
> unnecessary level of indentation.
> 

> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index b2633a72e871..e398f6e43f61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
>  	{								\
>  		if (static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) { \
>  			if (cond) {					\
> -				scoped_guard(preempt_notrace)		\
> -					__DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args)); \
> +				guard(preempt_notrace)();		\
> +				__DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));	\
>  			}						\
>  		}							\
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) {		\
> @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
>  	{								\
>  		might_fault();						\
>  		if (static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) {	\
> -			scoped_guard(rcu_tasks_trace)			\
> -				__DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));	\
> +			guard(rcu_tasks_trace)();			\
> +			__DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));		\
>  		}							\
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {			\
>  			WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(),			\

Yeah, that also works.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux