Applied, thanks. Huacai On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > On 11/22/2024 08:41 AM, John Fastabend wrote: > > > Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > >> (1) Description of Problem: > > >> > > >> When testing BPF JIT with the latest compiler toolchains on LoongArch, > > >> there exist some strange failed test cases, dmesg shows something like > > >> this: > > >> > > >> # dmesg -t | grep FAIL | head -1 > > >> ... ret -3 != -3 (0xfffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL ... > > > > ... > > > > >> > > >> (5) Final Solution: > > >> > > >> Keep a5 zero-extended, but explicitly sign-extend a0 (which is used > > >> outside BPF land). Because libbpf currently defines the return value > > >> of an ebpf program as a 32-bit unsigned integer, just use addi.w to > > >> extend bit 31 into bits 63 through 32 of a5 to a0. This is similar > > >> with commit 2f1b0d3d7331 ("riscv, bpf: Sign-extend return values"). > > >> > > >> Fixes: 5dc615520c4d ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") > > >> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 2 +- > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c > > >> index 7dbefd4ba210..dd350cba1252 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c > > >> +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c > > >> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void __build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool is_tail_call) > > >> > > >> if (!is_tail_call) { > > >> /* Set return value */ > > >> - move_reg(ctx, LOONGARCH_GPR_A0, regmap[BPF_REG_0]); > > >> + emit_insn(ctx, addiw, LOONGARCH_GPR_A0, regmap[BPF_REG_0], 0); > > > > > > Not overly familiar with this JIT but just to check this wont be used > > > for BPF 2 BPF calls correct? > > > > I am not sure I understand your comment correctly, but with and without > > this patch, the LoongArch JIT uses a5 as a dedicated register for BPF > > return values, a5 is kept as zero-extended for bpf2bpf, just make a0 > > (which is used outside BPF land) as sign-extend, all of the test cases > > in test_bpf.ko passed with "echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable". > > > > Thanks, > > Tiezhu > > > > Got it. > > Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>