On 11/20/2024 6:40 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:25:43 -0800 > >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:06:56 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>>> This clearly could be multiple series, please don't go over the limit. >>> >>> Sorta. >>> I think I'll split it into two: changing the current logic + adding new >>> functions and libeth_xdp. Maybe I could merge the second one with the >>> Chapter IV, will see. >> >> FWIW I was tempted to cherry-pick patches 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7, since they >> look uncontroversial and stand on their own. But wasn't 100% sure I'm >> not missing a dependency. Then I thought - why take the risk, let me >> complain instead :) Easier to make progress with smaller series.. > > Sure, I understand. I wasn't sure it's not too much for one series, in > such cases, I let the reviewers choose :) > > Thanks, > Olek > 15 limit has been the policy for quite some time, and I don't recall seeing >15 get merged in recent memory. Even 15 can sometimes be pushing it when there is obvious good breakpoints for series.
