On Wed, 2024-11-20 at 16:53 -0800, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > Both acquire_lock_state and release_lock_state take the bpf_func_state > as a parameter, while find_lock_state does not. Future patches will end > up requiring operating on non-cur_func(env) bpf_func_state (for > resilient locks), hence just make the prototype consistent and take > bpf_func_state directly. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
