Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: Fix exact match conditions in trie_get_next_key()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hou Tao <houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> trie_get_next_key() uses node->prefixlen == key->prefixlen to identify
> an exact match, However, it is incorrect because when the target key
> doesn't fully match the found node (e.g., node->prefixlen != matchlen),
> these two nodes may also have the same prefixlen. It will return
> expected result when the passed key exist in the trie. However when a
> recently-deleted key or nonexistent key is passed to
> trie_get_next_key(), it may skip keys and return incorrect result.
>
> Fix it by using node->prefixlen == matchlen to identify exact matches.
> When the condition is true after the search, it also implies
> node->prefixlen equals key->prefixlen, otherwise, the search would
> return NULL instead.
>
> Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux