Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc
From: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:40:12 +0000
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AM6PR03MB50804C0DF9FB1E844B593FDB99202@AM6PR03MB5080.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

I noticed that the path_d_path_kfunc_non_lsm test case failed in BPF CI,
I will fix it in the next version.

But before that, I would like to get some feedback. :)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc
  - From: Christian Brauner

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc
  - From: Juntong Deng

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Make inode storage available to tracing prog
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_fget_task() kfunc
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux