Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make bpf_map order and indices stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently, libbpf re-sorts bpf_map structs after all the maps are added and
> initialized, which might change their relative order and invalidate any
> bpf_map pointer or index taken before that. This is inconvenient and
> error-prone. For instance, it can cause .kconfig map index to point to a wrong
> map.
>
> Furthermore, libbpf itself doesn't rely on any specific ordering of bpf_maps,
> so it's just an unnecessary complication right now. This patch drops sorting
> of maps and makes their relative positions fixed. If efficient index is ever
> needed, it's better to have a separate array of pointers as a search index,
> instead of reordering bpf_map struct in-place. This will be less error-prone
> and will allow multiple independent orderings, if necessary (e.g., either by
> section index or by name).
>
> Fixes: 166750bc1dd2 ("libbpf: Support libbpf-provided extern variables")
> Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>

Applied. Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux