Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] Fixes for LPM trie

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-11-18 09:07:58 [+0800], Hou Tao wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi,
Hi,

> Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always
> welcome.

This might be a coincidence but it seems I get

| helper_fill_hashmap(282):FAIL:can't update hashmap err: Unknown error -12
| test_maps: test_maps.c:1379: __run_parallel: Assertion `status == 0' failed.

more often with the series when I do ./test_maps. I never managed to
pass the test with series while it passed on v6.12. I'm not blaming the
series, just pointing this out it might be known…

In 08/10 you switch the locks to raw_spinlock_t. I was a little worried
that a lot of elements will make the while() loop go for a long time. Is
there a test for this? I run into "test_progs -a map_kptr" and noticed
something else…

Sebastian





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux