[PATCH v2] ARC: bpf: Correct conditional check in 'check_jmp_32'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The original code checks 'if (ARC_CC_AL)', which is always true since
ARC_CC_AL is a constant. This makes the check redundant and likely
obscures the intention of verifying whether the jump is conditional.

Updates the code to check cond == ARC_CC_AL instead, reflecting the intent
to differentiate conditional from unconditional jumps.

Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changelog in V2:

- Changed subject line
- Updated condition check to 'if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)' instead of removing it

Link for v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e6d27adb-151c-46c1-9668-1cd2b492321b@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
---
 arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
index 4458e409ca0a..6d989b6d88c6 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
@@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@ bool check_jmp_32(u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off, u8 cond)
 	addendum = (cond == ARC_CC_AL) ? 0 : INSN_len_normal;
 	disp = get_displacement(curr_off + addendum, targ_off);
 
-	if (ARC_CC_AL)
+	if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)
 		return is_valid_far_disp(disp);
 	else
 		return is_valid_near_disp(disp);
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux