On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 6:15 AM Hou Tao <houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 11/10/2024 7:29 PM, Florian Lehner wrote: > > Introduce a new flag for batch operations that allows the deletion process > > to continue even if certain keys are missing. This simplifies map flushing > > by eliminating the requirement to maintain a separate list of keys and > > makes sure maps can be flushed with a single batch delete operation. > > Is it expensive to close and recreate a new map instead ? If it is > expensive, does it make more sense to add a new command to delete all > elements in the map ? Because reusing the deletion logic will make each > deletion involve an unnecessary lookup operation. +1 to above questions. In addition: What is the use case ? Are you trying to erase all elements from the map ? If so you bpf_for_each_map_elem() and delete elems while iterating. This extra flag looks too specific. pw-bot: cr
