Re: [bpf PATCH 2/2] bpf: xdp, remove no longer required rcu_read_{un}lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/01/09 15:35, John Fastabend wrote:
Toshiaki Makita wrote:
On 2020/01/09 6:35, John Fastabend wrote:
Now that we depend on rcu_call() and synchronize_rcu() to also wait
for preempt_disabled region to complete the rcu read critical section
in __dev_map_flush() is no longer relevant.

These originally ensured the map reference was safe while a map was
also being free'd. But flush by new rules can only be called from
preempt-disabled NAPI context. The synchronize_rcu from the map free
path and the rcu_call from the delete path will ensure the reference
here is safe. So lets remove the rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock
pair to avoid any confusion around how this is being protected.

If the rcu_read_lock was required it would mean errors in the above
logic and the original patch would also be wrong.

Fixes: 0536b85239b84 ("xdp: Simplify devmap cleanup")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   kernel/bpf/devmap.c |    2 --
   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index f0bf525..0129d4a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -378,10 +378,8 @@ void __dev_map_flush(void)
   	struct list_head *flush_list = this_cpu_ptr(&dev_map_flush_list);
   	struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq, *tmp;
- rcu_read_lock();
   	list_for_each_entry_safe(bq, tmp, flush_list, flush_node)
   		bq_xmit_all(bq, XDP_XMIT_FLUSH);
-	rcu_read_unlock();

I introduced this lock because some drivers have assumption that
.ndo_xdp_xmit() is called under RCU. (commit 86723c864063)

Maybe devmap deletion logic does not need this anymore, but is it
OK to drivers?

Ah OK thanks for catching this. So its a strange requirement from
virto_net to need read_lock like this. Quickly scanned the drivers
and seems its the only one.

I think the best path forward is to fix virtio_net so it doesn't
need rcu_read_lock() here then the locking is much cleaner IMO.

Actually veth is calling rcu_dereference in .ndo_xdp_xmit() so it needs
the same treatment. In the reference I sent in another mail, Jesper
said mlx5 also has some RCU dependency.

I'll send a v2 and either move the xdp enabled check (the piece
using the rcu_read_lock) into a bitmask flag or push the
rcu_read_lock() into virtio_net so its clear that this is a detail
of virtio_net and not a general thing. FWIW I don't think the
rcu_read_lock is actually needed in the virtio_net case anymore
either but pretty sure the rcu_dereference will cause an rcu
splat. Maybe there is another annotation we can use. I'll dig
into it tomorrow. Thanks

I'm thinking we can just move the rcu_lock to wrap around only ndo_xdp_xmit.
But as you suggest if we can identify all drivers which depends on RCU and move the
rcu_lock into the drivers (or remove the dependency) it's better.

Toshiaki Makita



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux