[PATCH dwarves 2/3] dwarf_loader: Refactor function check_dwarf_locations()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The newly-added function check_dwarf_locations() supports two variants
of implementations: elfutils "version < 157" and "version >= 157".
The "version < 157" supports one single location (dwarf_getlocation())
and "version >= 157" supports location lists (dwarf_getlocations()).

Currently, even for dwarf_getlocations(), only the first location
and its first expression is checked. In the subsequent patch, all
locations and all expressions may be changed. So this patch refactors
the code such that two different implementations (based on elfutils
versions) are clearly separated. This makes subsequent change cleaner.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 dwarf_loader.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
index 4bb9096..e0b8c11 100644
--- a/dwarf_loader.c
+++ b/dwarf_loader.c
@@ -1160,22 +1160,47 @@ static struct template_parameter_pack *template_parameter_pack__new(Dwarf_Die *d
 static bool check_dwarf_locations(Dwarf_Attribute *attr, struct parameter *parm,
 				  struct cu *cu, int param_idx)
 {
+	int expected_reg = cu->register_params[param_idx];
 	Dwarf_Addr base, start, end;
 	struct location loc;
+	Dwarf_Op *expr;
 
+	if (!parm->has_loc)
+		return false;
+
+#if _ELFUTILS_PREREQ(0, 157)
 	/* dwarf_getlocations() handles location lists; here we are
 	 * only interested in the first expr.
 	 */
-	if (parm->has_loc &&
-#if _ELFUTILS_PREREQ(0, 157)
-	    dwarf_getlocations(attr, 0, &base, &start, &end,
+	if (dwarf_getlocations(attr, 0, &base, &start, &end,
 			       &loc.expr, &loc.exprlen) > 0 &&
+		loc.exprlen != 0) {
+		expr = loc.expr;
+
+		switch (expr->atom) {
+		case DW_OP_reg0 ... DW_OP_reg31:
+			/* mark parameters that use an unexpected
+			 * register to hold a parameter; these will
+			 * be problematic for users of BTF as they
+			 * violate expectations about register
+			 * contents.
+			 */
+			if (expected_reg >= 0 && expected_reg != expr->atom)
+				parm->unexpected_reg = 1;
+			break;
+		default:
+			parm->optimized = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
 #else
-	    dwarf_getlocation(attr, &loc.expr, &loc.exprlen) == 0 &&
-#endif
+	if (dwarf_getlocation(attr, &loc.expr, &loc.exprlen) == 0 &&
 		loc.exprlen != 0) {
-		int expected_reg = cu->register_params[param_idx];
-		Dwarf_Op *expr = loc.expr;
+		expr = loc.expr;
 
 		switch (expr->atom) {
 		case DW_OP_reg0 ... DW_OP_reg31:
@@ -1197,6 +1222,7 @@ static bool check_dwarf_locations(Dwarf_Attribute *attr, struct parameter *parm,
 	}
 
 	return false;
+#endif
 }
 
 static struct parameter *parameter__new(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
-- 
2.43.5





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux