On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:57:40AM +0000, zijianzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We should do sk_rmem_schedule instead of sk_wmem_schedule in function > bpf_tcp_ingress. We also need to update sk_rmem_alloc accordingly to > account for the rmem. > Is it possible to have a test case for this? I think it would be easier to prove and convince people to accept these changes. Thanks!