On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:06 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:11:07PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:42 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > > > > > SNIP > > > > > > > > > - Jiri Olsa's uprobe "session" support ([5]). This is less > > > > > performance focused, but important functionality by itself. But I'm > > > > > calling this out here because the first two patches are pure uprobe > > > > > internal changes, and I believe they should go into tip/perf/core to > > > > > avoid conflicts with the rest of pending uprobe changes. > > > > > > > > > > Peter, do you mind applying those two and creating a stable tag for > > > > > bpf-next to pull? We'll apply the rest of Jiri's series to > > > > > bpf-next/master. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > there's uprobe session support change that already landed in tip tree, > > > > but we have bpf related changes that need to go in through bpf-next tree > > > > > > > > could you please create the stable tag that we could pull to bpf-next/master > > > > and apply the rest of the uprobe session changes in there? > > > > > > Ping. We (BPF) are blocked on this, we can't apply Jiri's uprobe > > > session series ([0]), until we merge two of his patches that landed > > > into perf/core. Can we please get a stable tag which we can use to > > > pull perf/core's patches into bpf-next/master? > > > > The whole tip/perf/core should be stable, but let me try and figure out > > how git tags work.. might as well read a man-page today. > > I might have managed to create a perf-core-for-bpf-next tag, but I'm not > sure I know enough about git to even test it. > > Let me know.. Looks good, thank you. I'm merging it into bpf-next, testing, and if everything looks good I'll apply Jiri's patches on top. Tag is more so of a promise that everything up to that tag won't be rebased, otherwise we'll run into tons of problems during the merge window. That seems to be the case, so I'm proceeding, thank you!
