On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 07:12:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:15:04AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 07:54:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:52:52PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > sending fix for buildid parsing that affects only stable trees > > > > after merging upstream fix [1]. > > > > > > > > Upstream then factored out the whole buildid parsing code, so it > > > > does not have the problem. > > > > > > Why not just take those patches instead? > > > > I guess we could, but I thought it's too big for stable > > > > we'd need following 2 changes to fix the issue: > > de3ec364c3c3 lib/buildid: add single folio-based file reader abstraction > > 60c845b4896b lib/buildid: take into account e_phoff when fetching program headers > > > > and there's also few other follow ups: > > 5ac9b4e935df lib/buildid: Handle memfd_secret() files in build_id_parse() > > cdbb44f9a74f lib/buildid: don't limit .note.gnu.build-id to the first page in ELF > > ad41251c290d lib/buildid: implement sleepable build_id_parse() API > > 45b8fc309654 lib/buildid: rename build_id_parse() into build_id_parse_nofault() > > 4e9d360c4cdf lib/buildid: remove single-page limit for PHDR search > > > > which I guess are not strictly needed > > Can you verify what exact ones are needed here? We'll be glad to take > them if you can verify that they work properly. ok, will check jirka
