Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] Fix resource leak checks for tail calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sun,  3 Nov 2024 14:59:37 -0800 you wrote:
> This set contains a fix for detecting unreleased RCU read locks or
> unfinished preempt_disable sections when performing a tail call. Spin
> locks are prevented by accident since they don't allow any function
> calls, including tail calls (modelled as call instruction to a helper),
> so we ensure they are checked as well, in preparation for relaxing
> function call restricton for critical sections in the future.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v1,1/3] bpf: Tighten tail call checks for lingering locks, RCU, preempt_disable
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/46f7ed32f7a8
  - [bpf-next,v1,2/3] bpf: Unify resource leak checks
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d402755ced2e
  - [bpf-next,v1,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for tail calls with locks and refs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/711df091dea9

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux