Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:44:04 -0700
Cc: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>, <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>, <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>, <vedang.patel@xxxxxxxxx>, <jithu.joseph@xxxxxxxxx>, <andre.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>, <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>, <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>, <sven.auhagen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>, <intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241026041249.1267664-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:12:45 +0800 Yue Haibing wrote:
> v4: Target to net-next

Nonetheless I'm going to assume Jake / Tony will take these.
LMK if we should apply directly.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers
  - From: Tony Nguyen

References:
- [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers
  - From: Yue Haibing

Prev by Date: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: use kfunc hooks instead of program types
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 10/14] net-timestamp: add basic support with tskey offset
Previous by thread: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] igb: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in igb_run_xdp()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]