Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/24 05:30, Yue Haibing wrote:
On 2024/10/23 3:17, Jacob Keller wrote:


On 10/22/2024 12:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:56:19PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
Fixing sparse error in xdp run code by introducing new variable xdp_res
instead of overloading this into the skb pointer as i40e drivers done
in commit 12738ac4754e ("i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c") and
commit ae4393dfd472 ("i40e: fix broken XDP support").

v3: Fix uninitialized 'xdp_res' in patch 3 and 4 which Reported-by
     kernel test robot
v2: Fix this as i40e drivers done instead of return NULL in xdp run code

Hi Yue Haibing, all,

I like these changes a lot. But I do wonder if it would
be more appropriate to target them at net-next (or iwl-next)
rather than net, without Fixes tags. This is because they
don't seem to be fixing (user-visible) bugs. Am I missing something?

...

Yea, these do seem like next candidates.

Should I resend this serial target to iwl-next?
yes, please
(please also link to v3 from v4)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux