On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 10:33 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: [...] > Using two u64s to describe stack slot mask is really-really > inconvenient. Yes > and increases memory usage by quite a lot. Given we intend to have > insn_history for each instruction soon, I'd keep stack size at max > of 512 bytes, even with bpf_fastcall. By 8mb for 1M instructions program. > Is it possible? If we drop this +40 bytes slack space everything else should work as expected.
