Hi Andrii, I was looking around in do_misc_fixups() and came across this ... > + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt); > + if (!new_prog) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + delta += cnt - 1; > + env->prog = prog = new_prog; > + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; > + continue; Should the above be turned into "goto next_insn" like the others that were touched by commit 011832b97b31 "bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction"? > + } > + > /* Implement bpf_kptr_xchg inline */ > if (prog->jit_requested && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && > insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_kptr_xchg &&
