On 10/22/24 03:37, Daniel Yang wrote: > Are there any possible unexpected issues that can be caused by this? This patch is apparently the cause of BPF self-tests failures: test_empty_skb:FAIL:ret: veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress [redirect_ingress] unexpected ret: veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress [redirect_ingress]: actual -34 != expected 0 test_empty_skb:PASS:err: veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress [redirect_egress] 0 nsec test_empty_skb:FAIL:ret: veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress [redirect_egress] unexpected ret: veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress [redirect_egress]: actual -34 != expected 1 Before submitting an eventual next revision, please very that BPF self-tests are happy. Thanks, Paolo
