Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] net-timestamp: open gate for bpf_setsockopt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:56 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > On 10/11/24 9:06 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> > >   static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> > >                           char *optval, int *optlen,
> > >                           bool getopt)
> > >   {
> > > +   struct so_timestamping ts;
> > > +   int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > >     switch (optname) {
> > >     case SO_REUSEADDR:
> > >     case SO_SNDBUF:
> > > @@ -5225,6 +5245,13 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> > >             break;
> > >     case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> > >             break;
> > > +   case SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW:
> > > +   case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
> >
> > How about remove the "_OLD" support ?
>
> +1 I forgot to mention that yesterday.

Hello Willem, Martin,

I did a test on this and found that if we only use
SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW, we will never enter the real set sk_tsflags_bpf
logic, unless there is "case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD".

And I checked SO_TIMESTAMPING in include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h:
#if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || (defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__ILP32__))
/* on 64-bit and x32, avoid the ?: operator */
...
#define SO_TIMESTAMPING         SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD
...
#else
...
#define SO_TIMESTAMPING (sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(__kernel_long_t) ?
SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD : SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW)
...
#endif

The SO_TIMESTAMPING is defined as SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD. I wonder if I
missed something? Thanks in advance.

Thanks,
Jason





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux