From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 32-bit hosts (e.g., arm32), when a bpf program passes a u64 to
bpf_iter_bits_new(), bpf_iter_bits_new() will use bits_copy to store the
content of the u64. However, bits_copy is only 4 bytes, leading to stack
corruption.
The straightforward solution would be to replace u64 with unsigned long
in bpf_iter_bits_new(). However, this introduces confusion and problems
for 32-bit hosts because the size of ulong in bpf program is 8 bytes,
but it is treated as 4-bytes after passed to bpf_iter_bits_new().
Fix it by changing the type of both bits and bit_count from unsigned
long to u64. However, the change is not enough. The main reason is that
bpf_iter_bits_next() uses find_next_bit() to find the next bit and the
pointer passed to find_next_bit() is an unsigned long pointer instead
of a u64 pointer. For 32-bit little-endian host, it is fine but it is
not the case for 32-bit big-endian host. Because under 32-bit big-endian
host, the first iterated unsigned long will be the bits 32-63 of the u64
instead of the expected bits 0-31. Therefore, in addition to changing
the type, swap the two unsigned longs within the u64 for 32-bit
big-endian host.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index c147f75e1b48..0ad85201fb84 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2855,13 +2855,36 @@ struct bpf_iter_bits {
struct bpf_iter_bits_kern {
union {
- unsigned long *bits;
- unsigned long bits_copy;
+ __u64 *bits;
+ __u64 bits_copy;
};
u32 nr_bits;
int bit;
} __aligned(8);
+/* On 64-bit hosts, unsigned long and u64 have the same size, so passing
+ * a u64 pointer and an unsigned long pointer to find_next_bit() will
+ * return the same result, as both point to the same 8-byte area.
+ *
+ * For 32-bit little-endian hosts, using a u64 pointer or unsigned long
+ * pointer also makes no difference. This is because the first iterated
+ * unsigned long is composed of bits 0-31 of the u64 and the second unsigned
+ * long is composed of bits 32-63 of the u64.
+ *
+ * However, for 32-bit big-endian hosts, this is not the case. The first
+ * iterated unsigned long will be bits 32-63 of the u64, so swap these two
+ * ulong values within the u64.
+ */
+static void swap_ulong_in_u64(u64 *bits, unsigned int nr)
+{
+#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+ bits[i] = (bits[i] >> 32) | ((u64)(u32)bits[i] << 32);
+#endif
+}
+
/**
* bpf_iter_bits_new() - Initialize a new bits iterator for a given memory area
* @it: The new bpf_iter_bits to be created
@@ -2903,6 +2926,8 @@ bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, u32 nr_w
if (err)
return -EFAULT;
+ swap_ulong_in_u64(&kit->bits_copy, nr_words);
+
kit->nr_bits = nr_bits;
return 0;
}
@@ -2918,6 +2943,8 @@ bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, u32 nr_w
return err;
}
+ swap_ulong_in_u64(kit->bits, nr_words);
+
kit->nr_bits = nr_bits;
return 0;
}
@@ -2935,7 +2962,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int *bpf_iter_bits_next(struct bpf_iter_bits *it)
{
struct bpf_iter_bits_kern *kit = (void *)it;
u32 nr_bits = kit->nr_bits;
- const unsigned long *bits;
+ const void *bits;
int bit;
if (kit->bit >= nr_bits)
--
2.29.2
