Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add tracing prog private stack tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:14:31PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:

SNIP

> +__naked __noinline __used
> +static unsigned long loop_callback(void)
> +{
> +	asm volatile (
> +	"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
> +	"r1 = 42;"
> +	"*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1;"
> +	"call cumulative_stack_depth_subprog;"
> +	"r0 = 0;"
> +	"exit;"
> +	:
> +	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
> +	: __clobber_common);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("raw_tp")
> +__description("Private stack, callback")
> +__success
> +__arch_x86_64
> +/* for func loop_callback */
> +__jited("func #1")
> +__jited("	endbr64")

this should fail if CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT is not enabled, right?

hm, but I can see that also in other tests, so I guess it's fine,
should we add it to config.x86_64 ?

jirka




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux