On 12/27/19 12:06 PM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
Introduce a new probe section (misc) for probes not related to concrete map types, program types, functions or kernel configuration. Introduce a probe for large INSN limit as the first one in that section. Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@xxxxxxx> --- tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c index 03bdc5b3ac49..4a7359b9a427 100644 --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c @@ -572,6 +572,18 @@ probe_helpers_for_progtype(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, bool supported_type, printf("\n"); }+static void+probe_large_insn_limit(const char *define_prefix, __u32 ifindex) +{ + bool res; + + res = bpf_probe_large_insn_limit(ifindex); + print_bool_feature("have_large_insn_limit", + "Large complexity limit and maximum program size (1M)", + "HAVE_LARGE_INSN_LIMIT",
HAVE_LARGE_INSN_LIMIT is good, but official description should not explicitly state the 1M limit since this could be subject to change. Perhaps just stating "Large complexity and program size limit" is better suited here.
+ res, define_prefix); +} + static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv) { enum probe_component target = COMPONENT_UNSPEC; @@ -724,6 +736,12 @@ static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv) probe_helpers_for_progtype(i, supported_types[i], define_prefix, ifindex);+ print_end_then_start_section("misc",+ "Scanning miscellaneous eBPF features...", + "/*** eBPF misc features ***/", + define_prefix); + probe_large_insn_limit(define_prefix, ifindex); + exit_close_json: if (json_output) { /* End current "section" of probes */
