Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > According to the prototype formal BPF memory consistency model > discussed e.g. in [1] and following the ordering properties of > the C/in-kernel macro atomic_cmpxchg(), a BPF atomic operation > with the BPF_CMPXCHG modifier is fully ordered. However, the > current RISC-V JIT lowerings fail to meet such memory ordering > property. This is illustrated by the following litmus test: > > BPF BPF__MP+success_cmpxchg+fence > { > 0:r1=x; 0:r3=y; 0:r5=1; > 1:r2=y; 1:r4=f; 1:r7=x; > } > P0 | P1 ; > *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = 1 | r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; > r2 = cmpxchg_64 (r3 + 0, r4, r5) | r3 = atomic_fetch_add((u64 *)(r4 + 0), r5) ; > | r6 = *(u64 *)(r7 + 0) ; > exists (1:r1=1 /\ 1:r6=0) > > whose "exists" clause is not satisfiable according to the BPF > memory model. Using the current RISC-V JIT lowerings, the test > can be mapped to the following RISC-V litmus test: > > RISCV RISCV__MP+success_cmpxchg+fence > { > 0:x1=x; 0:x3=y; 0:x5=1; > 1:x2=y; 1:x4=f; 1:x7=x; > } > P0 | P1 ; > sd x5, 0(x1) | ld x1, 0(x2) ; > L00: | amoadd.d.aqrl x3, x5, 0(x4) ; > lr.d x2, 0(x3) | ld x6, 0(x7) ; > bne x2, x4, L01 | ; > sc.d x6, x5, 0(x3) | ; > bne x6, x4, L00 | ; > fence rw, rw | ; > L01: | ; > exists (1:x1=1 /\ 1:x6=0) > > where the two stores in P0 can be reordered. Update the RISC-V > JIT lowerings/implementation of BPF_CMPXCHG to emit an SC with > RELEASE ("rl") annotation in order to meet the expected memory > ordering guarantees. The resulting RISC-V JIT lowerings of > BPF_CMPXCHG match the RISC-V lowerings of the C atomic_cmpxchg(). Thanks for fixing this, I fixed all others in: 20a759df3bba ("riscv, bpf: make some atomic operations fully ordered") > Fixes: dd642ccb45ec ("riscv, bpf: Implement more atomic operations for RV64") > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1949/attachments/1665/3441/bpfmemmodel.2024.09.19p.pdf [1] > --- > arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c > index 99f34409fb60f..c207aa33c980b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c > @@ -548,8 +548,8 @@ static void emit_atomic(u8 rd, u8 rs, s16 off, s32 imm, bool is64, > rv_lr_w(r0, 0, rd, 0, 0), ctx); > jmp_offset = ninsns_rvoff(8); > emit(rv_bne(RV_REG_T2, r0, jmp_offset >> 1), ctx); > - emit(is64 ? rv_sc_d(RV_REG_T3, rs, rd, 0, 0) : > - rv_sc_w(RV_REG_T3, rs, rd, 0, 0), ctx); > + emit(is64 ? rv_sc_d(RV_REG_T3, rs, rd, 0, 1) : > + rv_sc_w(RV_REG_T3, rs, rd, 0, 1), ctx); > jmp_offset = ninsns_rvoff(-6); > emit(rv_bne(RV_REG_T3, 0, jmp_offset >> 1), ctx); > emit(rv_fence(0x3, 0x3), ctx); > -- > 2.43.0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature