Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/13] bpf: lsm: Init Hooks and create files in securityfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30-Dez 11:20, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0100, KP Singh wrote:
> > On 23-Dec 22:28, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:43 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Good catch! You're right. These macros will not be there in v2 as
> > we move to using trampolines based callbacks.
> 
> Speaking of which -- is the BPF trampoline code correctly designed to be
> W^X?

Thanks for pointing this out!

I don't think this is the case as of now.

The dispatcher logic and the tracing programs allocate one page where
one half of it is used for the active trampoline and the other half is
used as a staging area for a future replacement. I sent a patch as an
attempt to fix this:

   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200103234725.22846-1-kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

- KP

> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux