[PATCH bpf 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix msg_verify_data in test_sockmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Function msg_verify_data should have context of bytes_cnt and k instead of
assuming they are zero. Otherwise, test_sockmap with data integrity test
will report some errors. I also fix the logic related to size and index j

1/ 6  sockmap::txmsg test passthrough:FAIL
2/ 6  sockmap::txmsg test redirect:FAIL
7/12  sockmap::txmsg test apply:FAIL
10/11  sockmap::txmsg test push_data:FAIL
11/17  sockmap::txmsg test pull-data:FAIL
12/ 9  sockmap::txmsg test pop-data:FAIL
13/ 1  sockmap::txmsg test push/pop data:FAIL
...
Pass: 24 Fail: 52

After applying this patch, some of the errors are solved, but for push,
pull and pop, we may need more fixes to msg_verify_data, added a TODO

10/11  sockmap::txmsg test push_data:FAIL
11/17  sockmap::txmsg test pull-data:FAIL
12/ 9  sockmap::txmsg test pop-data:FAIL
...
Pass: 37 Fail: 15

Besides, added a custom errno EDATAINTEGRITY for msg_verify_data, we
shall not ignore the error in txmsg_cork case.

Fixes: 753fb2ee0934 ("bpf: sockmap, add msg_peek tests to test_sockmap")
Fixes: 16edddfe3c5d ("selftests/bpf: test_sockmap, check test failure")
Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index 3e02d7267de8..8249f3c1fbd6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ static void running_handler(int a);
 #define BPF_SOCKHASH_FILENAME "test_sockhash_kern.bpf.o"
 #define CG_PATH "/sockmap"
 
+#define EDATAINTEGRITY 2001
+
 /* global sockets */
 int s1, s2, c1, c2, p1, p2;
 int test_cnt;
@@ -510,23 +512,25 @@ static int msg_alloc_iov(struct msghdr *msg,
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
-static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz)
+/* TODO: Add verification logic for push, pull and pop data */
+static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz,
+				 unsigned char *k_p, int *bytes_cnt_p)
 {
-	int i, j = 0, bytes_cnt = 0;
-	unsigned char k = 0;
+	int i, j, bytes_cnt = *bytes_cnt_p;
+	unsigned char k = *k_p;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < msg->msg_iovlen; i++) {
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < msg->msg_iovlen && size; i++, j = 0) {
 		unsigned char *d = msg->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
 
 		/* Special case test for skb ingress + ktls */
 		if (i == 0 && txmsg_ktls_skb) {
 			if (msg->msg_iov[i].iov_len < 4)
-				return -EIO;
+				return -EDATAINTEGRITY;
 			if (memcmp(d, "PASS", 4) != 0) {
 				fprintf(stderr,
 					"detected skb data error with skb ingress update @iov[%i]:%i \"%02x %02x %02x %02x\" != \"PASS\"\n",
 					i, 0, d[0], d[1], d[2], d[3]);
-				return -EIO;
+				return -EDATAINTEGRITY;
 			}
 			j = 4; /* advance index past PASS header */
 		}
@@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz)
 				fprintf(stderr,
 					"detected data corruption @iov[%i]:%i %02x != %02x, %02x ?= %02x\n",
 					i, j, d[j], k - 1, d[j+1], k);
-				return -EIO;
+				return -EDATAINTEGRITY;
 			}
 			bytes_cnt++;
 			if (bytes_cnt == chunk_sz) {
@@ -546,6 +550,8 @@ static int msg_verify_data(struct msghdr *msg, int size, int chunk_sz)
 			size--;
 		}
 	}
+	*k_p = k;
+	*bytes_cnt_p = bytes_cnt;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -602,6 +608,8 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 		float total_bytes, txmsg_pop_total;
 		int fd_flags = O_NONBLOCK;
 		struct timeval timeout;
+		unsigned char k = 0;
+		int bytes_cnt = 0;
 		fd_set w;
 
 		fcntl(fd, fd_flags);
@@ -696,7 +704,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 						iov_length * cnt :
 						iov_length * iov_count;
 
-				errno = msg_verify_data(&msg, recv, chunk_sz);
+				errno = msg_verify_data(&msg, recv, chunk_sz, &k, &bytes_cnt);
 				if (errno) {
 					perror("data verify msg failed");
 					goto out_errno;
@@ -704,7 +712,9 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 				if (recvp) {
 					errno = msg_verify_data(&msg_peek,
 								recvp,
-								chunk_sz);
+								chunk_sz,
+								&k,
+								&bytes_cnt);
 					if (errno) {
 						perror("data verify msg_peek failed");
 						goto out_errno;
@@ -812,7 +822,7 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt)
 				s.bytes_sent, sent_Bps, sent_Bps/giga,
 				s.bytes_recvd, recvd_Bps, recvd_Bps/giga,
 				peek_flag ? "(peek_msg)" : "");
-		if (err && txmsg_cork)
+		if (err && err != -EDATAINTEGRITY && txmsg_cork)
 			err = 0;
 		exit(err ? 1 : 0);
 	} else if (rxpid == -1) {
-- 
2.20.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux