Re: [PATCHv6 bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test

[Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 07:30:19PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:13 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
> > so we get the session into the test mix.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c        | 63 +++++++++++++++----
> >  .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c        | 16 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> you are undoing most of the changes done in the previous patch... it
> seems like it would be better to just combine  both patches

ok, the diff looks actualy ok, I'll squash them together

thanks,
jirka

> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > index 2effe4d693b4..df9314309bc3 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> > @@ -761,6 +761,10 @@ get_program(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int prog)
> >                 return skel->progs.uprobe_0;
> >         case 1:
> >                 return skel->progs.uprobe_1;
> > +       case 2:
> > +               return skel->progs.uprobe_2;
> > +       case 3:
> > +               return skel->progs.uprobe_3;
> >         default:
> >                 ASSERT_FAIL("get_program");
> >                 return NULL;
> 
> [...]