Re: [PATCH bpf RESEND 1/2] bpf: Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 15:11 +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When trying to repeat the btf fields for array of nested struct, it
> doesn't check the remaining info_cnt. The following splat will be
> reported when the value of ret * nelems is greater than BTF_FIELDS_MAX:

[...]

> Fix it by checking the remaining info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() before
> repeating the btf fields.
> 
> Fixes: 64e8ee814819 ("bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively.")
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>

> @@ -3681,10 +3687,10 @@ static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
>  
>  	if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
>  		return 0;
> -	if (nelems > info_cnt)
> +	if (!info_cnt)
>  		return -E2BIG;
>  	if (nelems > 1) {
> -		ret = btf_repeat_fields(info, 1, nelems - 1, sz);
> +		ret = btf_repeat_fields(info, info_cnt, 1, nelems - 1, sz);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  	}


I think the change like below (on top of yours) would work the same
(because nelems is >= 1 at this point):

-       if (!info_cnt)
-               return -E2BIG;
-       if (nelems > 1) {
-               ret = btf_repeat_fields(info, info_cnt, 1, nelems - 1, sz);
-               if (ret < 0)
-                       return ret;
-       }
+
+       ret = btf_repeat_fields(info, info_cnt, 1, nelems - 1, sz);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;

wdyt?






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux