Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:35:19PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +static int test_run_prog(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>> + struct bpf_test_run_opts *opts, int expect_val)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), opts);
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts"))
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + if (!ASSERT_EQ((int)opts->retval, expect_val, bpf_program__name(prog)))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void test_kfunc_module_order(void)
>> +{
>> + struct kfunc_module_order *skel;
>> + char pkt_data[64] = {};
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, test_opts, .data_in = pkt_data,
>> + .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_data));
>> +
>> + err = load_module("bpf_test_modorder_x.ko",
>> + env_verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE);
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load bpf_test_modorder_x.ko"))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + err = load_module("bpf_test_modorder_y.ko",
>> + env_verbosity > VERBOSE_NONE);
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load bpf_test_modorder_y.ko"))
>> + goto exit_modx;
>> +
>> + skel = kfunc_module_order__open_and_load();
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kfunc_module_order__open_and_load()")) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto exit_mods;
>> + }
>> +
>> + test_run_prog(skel->progs.call_kfunc_xy, &test_opts, 0);
>> + test_run_prog(skel->progs.call_kfunc_yx, &test_opts, 0);
>
> nit, no need to pass expect_val, it's always 0
Sure, can get rid of that...
-Toke
