On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 20:42 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: [...] > Not sure what Eduard is suggesting here, tbh. But I think if this > actually can happen that we have a non-loaded BPF program in one of > those struct_ops slots, then let's add a test demonstrating that. Given the call chain listed in a previous email I think that such situation is not possible (modulo obj->gen_loader, which I know nothing about). Thus I suggest to add a pr_warn() and return -EINVAL or something like that here. > Worst case of what can happen right now is the kernel rejecting > struct_ops loading due to -22 as a program FD. > > pw-bot: cr [...]
