Re: [PATCH dwarves v4 0/4] Emit global variables in BTF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:48:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:24:01AM -0700, Stephen Brennan wrote:
> > Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:21 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:26:24AM -0700, Stephen Brennan wrote:
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > This is v4 of the series which adds global variables to pahole's generated BTF.
> > >> >
> > >> > Since v3:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. Gathered Alan's Reviewed-by + Tested-by, and Jiri's Acked-by.
> > >> > 2. Consistently start shndx loops at 1, and use size_t.
> > >> > 3. Since patch 1 of v3 was already applied, I dropped it out of this series.
> > >> >
> > >> > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20241002235253.487251-1-stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > >> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20240920081903.13473-1-stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > >> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20240912190827.230176-1-stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks everyone for your review, tests, and consideration!
> > >>
> > >> Looks ok, I run the existing regression tests:
> > >>
> > >> acme@x1:~/git/pahole$ tests/tests
> > >>   1: Validation of BTF encoding of functions; this may take some time: Ok
> > >>   2: Pretty printing of files using DWARF type information: Ok
> > >>   3: Parallel reproducible DWARF Loading/Serial BTF encoding: Ok
> > >> /home/acme/git/pahole
> > >> acme@x1:~/git/pahole$
> > >>
> > >> And now I'm building a kernel with clang + Thin LTO + Rust enabled in
> > >> the kernel to test other fixes I have merged and doing that with your
> > >> patch series.
> > >>
> > >> Its all in the next branch and will move to master later today or
> > >> tomorrow when I finish the clang+LTO+Rust tests.
> > >
> > > pahole-staging testing in libbpf CI started failing recently, can you
> > > please double-check and see if this was caused by these changes? They
> > > seem to be related to encoding BTF for per-CPU global variables, so
> > > might be relevant ([0] for full run logs)
> > >
> > >   #33      btf_dump:FAIL
> > >   libbpf: extern (var ksym) 'bpf_prog_active': not found in kernel BTF
> > >   libbpf: failed to load object 'kfunc_call_test_subprog'
> > >   libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kfunc_call_test_subprog': -22
> > >   test_subprog:FAIL:skel unexpected error: -22
> > >   #126/17  kfunc_call/subprog:FAIL
> > >   test_subprog_lskel:FAIL:skel unexpected error: -2
> > >   #126/18  kfunc_call/subprog_lskel:FAIL
> > >   #126     kfunc_call:FAIL
> > >   test_ksyms_module_lskel:FAIL:test_ksyms_module_lskel__open_and_load
> > > unexpected error: -2
> > >   #135/1   ksyms_module/lskel:FAIL
> > >   libbpf: extern (var ksym) 'bpf_testmod_ksym_percpu': not found in kernel BTF
> > >   libbpf: failed to load object 'test_ksyms_module'
> > >   libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_ksyms_module': -22
> > >   test_ksyms_module_libbpf:FAIL:test_ksyms_module__open unexpected error: -22
> > >   #135/2   ksyms_module/libbpf:FAIL
> > >
> > >
> > >   [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11204199648/job/31142297399#step:4:12480
> > 
> > Hi Andrii,
> > 
> > Thanks for the report.
> > 
> > The error: "'bpf_prog_active' not found in kernel BTF" sounds like it's
> > related to a bug that was present in v4 of this patch series:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/ZwPob57HKYbfNpOH@x1/T/#t
> > 
> > Basically due to poor testing of a small refactor on my part, pahole
> > failed to emit almost all of the variables for BTF, so it would very
> > likely cause this error. And I think this broken commit may have been
> > hanging around in the git repository for the weekend, maybe Arnaldo can
> > confirm whether or not it was fixed up.
> > 
> > I cannot see the git SHA for the pahole branch which was used in this CI
> > run, so I can't say for sure. But I do see that the "tmp.master" branch
> > is now fixed up, so a re-run would verify whether this is the root
> > cause.
> 
> right, that is a piece of info I sometimes miss, the SHA used for the
> test run, but today's test is in progress and should have the fix for
> the inverted logic, we'll see...

https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11221662157/job/31192457160

Passed, so and here as well:

acme@x1:~/git/pahole$ tests/tests 
  1: Validation of BTF encoding of functions; this may take some time: Ok
  2: Pretty printing of files using DWARF type information: Ok
  3: Parallel reproducible DWARF Loading/Serial BTF encoding: Ok
acme@x1:~/git/pahole$

- Arnaldo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux