Re: [PATCH] selftests: Do not skip BPF selftests by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:53:47AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This effectively is a revert of commit 7a6eb7c34a78 ("selftests: Skip
> BPF seftests by default"). At the time when this was added, BPF had
> "build time dependencies on cutting edge versions". Since then a
> number of BPF capable tests has been included in net, hid, sched_ext.
> 
> There is no reason not to include BPF by default in the build.

The issue was always requiring a bleeding edge version of clang, not
sure if that's been relaxed yet, IIRC sometimes it required git
versions.  I have clang 20 installed here so that's not an issue for me
but given that that's not released yet it wouldn't be reasonable to
expect CI systems to install it.

There's a few other substantial issues with all of these suites now I
look, none of them build on arm64 since arm64 defconfig has
DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED=y which isn't compatible with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
so that gets turned off and the build splats trying to read the BTF out
of the kernel binary (which is a new build dep for the selftests
too...).  

   https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20241004/arm64/defconfig%2Bkselftest/gcc-12/config/

We also get a bunch of:

die__process_unit: DW_TAG_label (0xa) @ <0x58eb7> not handled!
die__process_unit: tag not supported 0xa (label)!

if we do turn enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF for arm64.  

The whole thing is also broken for cross compilation with clang since
everything is assuming that CROSS_COMPILE will be set for cross builds
but that's not the case for LLVM=1 builds - net gives:

  BPF_PROG nat6to4.bpf.o
  BPF_PROG sample_map_ret0.bpf.o
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/libynl.a(ynl.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/libynl.a(ynl.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/libynl.a(ynl.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/libynl.a: error adding symbols: file in wrong format
  BPF_PROG sample_ret0.bpf.o
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

with similar errors in libbpf for HID:

/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tools/build/libbpf/libbpf.a(libbpf-in.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)
/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: /home/broonie/git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tools/build/libbpf/libbpf.a(libbpf-in.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)

KernelCI is seeing failures earlier with HID:

   https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20241004/arm64/defconfig%2Bkselftest/gcc-12/logs/kselftest.log

and an unrelated missing dependency on libssl for net that needs to be
fixed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux